Back to the future on Terrorism
Itās hard not to be panicky about the terrorist threat these days. Weāve seen a terrorist group take over a large chunk of Iraq and impose a brutal regime. Thereās no end in sight to the Syrian civil war and little hope of reuniting the country. Extremist forces are increasingly taking over the opposition to the Bashar al-Assad regime. In Afghanistan, as the deadline approaches for NATOās withdrawal, Taliban forces are staging a comeback.
ĢżĢżĢż
Europe is particularly threatened by the return of EU citizens who have been fighting with radical al-Qaida-lined groups in Syria, according to Gilles de Kerchove, the EU counterterrorism coordinator. The US head of National Counterterrorism Center, Matthew G. Olsen, also warned about āwider array of threats in a greater variety of locations across the Middle East and around the world.ā What happened to the global war on terrorism (GWT) and Western determination after 9/11 to put an end to terrorism once and for all?Ā Ā
A shifting threat
Until August 2013, I was employed by the CIA, authoring the National Intelligence Councilās long range analysis ā what is called āglobal trendsā ā which is briefed to the US President at the start of his administration. In compiling my book Iāve gone back to evaluate those forecasts. The first global trends report I did was for the Bush Administration three years after 9/11, when the global war on terror was in full swing. Hopes were high in and out of government that terrorism could be defeated. I was far less sanguine: āThe key factors show no signs of abating over the next 15 years. The revival of Muslim identity will create a framework for the spread of radical Islamic ideology both inside and outside the Middle East, including Western Europe, Southeast Asia and Central Asia.ā
ĢżĢżĢż
The press played up the fact that while the administration contended āIraq was an integral part of US efforts to combat terrorism,ā the report I authored warned that Iraq was providing terrorists with āa training ground, a recruitment ground, the opportunity for enhancing technical skills.ā One of my global scenarios in the work was of a caliphate, which got right many of features of ISIS, including its breakaway from al-Qaāida.Ā
In the 2008 edition I talked about al-Qaāida breaking up ā almost three years before Osama bin Ladenās takedown. Past terrorist waves usually saw the group originating it ā in this case core al-Qaāida ā breaking up midway through the cycle. The violence does not cease and could actually increase, but the splintered survivors are more locally focused. The threat is now from the splinter groups, some of which are more capable than I or others originally anticipated as shown by the rapid ISIS gains in Iraq. In the recent words of General Clapper, director of National Intelligence, āthe terrorist threat is not diminishing. It is spreading globally and it is morphing more and more into so-called franchises.ā
ĢżĢżĢż
Oddly, in the wake of the Western failures in Iraq and Afghanistan, the pendulum is now swinging away from any intervention. If, God forbid, another 9/11-like attack occurred today, I think the US could well turn its back on the Middle East, albeit after lobbing a few missiles into the group held responsible. The attempt this time would be to harden borders, restricting inflows into the US homeland. No war on terrorism, but instead Fortress America. Clapperās worries that US intelligence capabilities have been hurt by a āperfect stormā of ālost intelligence sourcesā because of Snowden and āsignificant budget cutsā could also favour a posture of more defence than offence.ĢżĢżĢżĢżĢżĢżĀ
Wider issues in the region
Both extremist reactions ā sins of commission and those of omission ā ignore the broader context and tend to treat terrorism as a standalone. Itās no accident that the Middle East ā where the terrorist threat is the greatest ā has lagged most other regions (except Africa) in exploiting globalisationās opportunities. In many Middle East and North Africa countries, higher educational attainment correlates with rising joblessness. The social contract that held states together has frayed. Itās been some time since Arab governments could āco-opt the educated youth into what used to be a relatively well paid civil service,ā according to the UNās Arab development reports. Governments everywhere have to be smarter to succeed. In the Middle East, the challenges are even greater because of the many religious and ethnic splits that were never overcome by Arab nationalism.
ĢżĢżĢż
From the beginning of my work on global trends, I strove to weave terrorism into a wider tapestry. Thatās also the reason why I focus onĀ the multiple factors that are coming together to produce revolutionary change. Back after 9/11 when terrorism was everything in foreign policy, the global trends reports drew policymaker attention to other challenges facing the US, such as the rise of China and the downsides of rapid globalization. Even before the 2008 financial crisis, economic insecurity was growing in Middle America, for example, which the reports highlighted.Ā
ĢżĢżĢż
Some of those broad trends favored terrorism and we stressed them in the analysis. Increasing individual empowerment meant individuals and small groups would have greater access to lethal weaponry. The use of bio or nuclear weapons someday by terrorists is not far-fetched. Cybercrime is a lot more common today than cyberterrorism, but itās probably just a matter of time. I saw it as equally wrong to hype the terrorist threat then as it is to downplay it now. A broader perspective helps policymakers gauge terrorismās relative importance in the vast panoply of US global interests.ĢżĢżĢż
How should the west respond?
What particularly worries me now is the rapid collapse of the nation-state in Iraq and Syria, essentially leaving a huge safe haven at the core of the Middle East. The operating space for terrorists has increased immensely. We are back to pre-9/11 when al-Qaāida had free reign in Afghanistan, but the area is much larger. Just how rapid was the collapse of Arab Spring hopes and resurgence in authoritarianism in Egypt, Turkey and the Gulf was also a bit of a surprise. The growing suppression of opposition in those countries makes for fertile ground for extremism and even terrorism. Itās clear the terrorist threat is rising, but we should take care, too, to learn from past mistakes.Ā Ā
ĢżĢżĢż
First, we need to avoid the panic. In re-reading some of the writings by US terrorist experts in the aftermath of 9/11, there was a sense of terrorism as an unstoppable tsunami: ānow that the World Trade Center is gone, Grand Central Station at rush hour would be an obvious target for Manhattan. Coordinated attacks on shopping malls, tourist attractions, casinos, schools, churches and synagogues, and sports events also are possible.ā If there is a consoling factor, it is that terrorists tend to be too harsh and brutal, which eventually alienates their own supporters. But it willĀ take time for the disaffection to grow to the point of threatening, for example, the caliphateās hold in Sunni areas in Iraq. Combatting potential attacks in US and Europe must be priority, counteracting just the symptoms wonāt get at the root causes.Ā
ĢżĢżĢż
Donāt get me wrong. I donāt see the US or Europe militarily intervening on a big scale. But, we need to be more active than we are, especially in stopping the regional conflagration from growing. Getting Iran and Saudi Arabia to sit down and start mending ties would be a start if we are to stem the escalation of current tensions into all-out war in the Middle East. Ramping up the pressure on the Shia government in Baghdad to draw the Sunnis back in is essential to combatting ISIS. Although naĆÆve perhaps about chances for a near term settlement, Secretary Kerry is right about trying to keep a peace process alive between Israel and the Palestinians. Most importantly, the US and Europe need to work together on a global plan for economic development of the Middle East. The Chinese recently offered to go in on some joint infrastructure projects in Africa with the US, why not a global effort in the Middle East. I haveĀ no illusions the terrorist threat will decrease immediately even if we managed all these things, but it could put them on the back foot.ĢżĢżĢż
Preparing to adapt
Scenarios are a big part of plotting out the future. They can be good or bad, but the point is that we need to get used to the future being radically different from the present, not just aĀ linear projection. I can see areas where there may be a qualitative leap forward unimaginable to most today. For instance, we could see the elimination of most extreme poverty in our lifetime. But I can also see where things could go seriously wrong, and the Middle East and terrorism are in that category.
ĢżĢżĢż
The drift toward a region-wide conflict pitting Saudi Arabia against Iran and its allies is a recipe for more widespread violence and chaos, so creating the breeding grounds for terrorism. In my book, I play out the logical conclusion of such continued Sunni-Shia conflict and it is predictably disastrous for all of us. The US and Europe have more than enough to occupy ourselves; publics are more than apathetic ā they want to stay out. However, this is no time for leaders to put their heads in the sand.
The Future Declassified: Megatrends That Will Undo the World Unless We Take Action by Mathew Burrows is published by Palgrave Mamcillan
Further information




